The Small
Business
Cyber Security Guy
⭐100K+ Monthly Downloads | ⭐Top 20 Apple Management | 🎧>2.5K per episode
Welcome to the blog and podcast, where we share brutally honest views, sharp opinions, and lived experience from four decades in the technology trenches. Whether you're here to read or tune in, expect no corporate fluff and no pulled punches.
Everything here is personal. These are my and the team’s thoughts, not those of our employers, clients, or any poor soul professionally tied to me. If you’re offended, take it up with me, not them.
What you’ll get here (and on the podcast):
Straight-talking advice for small businesses that want to stay secure
Honest takes on cybersecurity trends, IT malpractice, and vendor nonsense
The occasional rant — and yes, the occasional expletive
War stories from the frontlines (names changed to protect the spectacularly guilty)
I've been doing this for over 40 years. I’ve seen genius, idiocy, and everything in between. Some of it makes headlines, and most of it should.
This blog and the podcast is where we unpack it all. Pull up a chair.
Why Personal Accountability Changes Everything: The Psychology of Director Liability
After two days discussing frameworks and technical standards, let's examine why personal accountability actually works when corporate fines consistently fail. The psychology is fascinating and explains decades of regulatory success and failure.
When British Airways faced a £20 million fine, nobody lost their job. When HSE prosecutes directors, workplace safety transforms overnight. The difference isn't the amount of money. It's whose money gets spent and whose freedom gets threatened. Human psychology responds very differently to personal consequences versus corporate abstractions.
The Three-Tier Cybersecurity Liability Framework: What It Means for Your Business
Yesterday's podcast proposed criminal liability for cybersecurity negligence. Today, we're dismantling the three-tier framework piece by piece so you know exactly where your business stands. Tier One protects small businesses with explicit gross negligence thresholds and Cyber Essentials safe harbour. Tier Two raises the bar for medium organisations whilst maintaining proportionate standards. Tier Three brings genuine consequences for large enterprises and public sector bodies that still can't implement MFA. This isn't fear-mongering. It's showing you precisely what reasonable care looks like at every business size so you can demonstrate compliance before anyone asks.
Prison Time for Directors? Part 2: Building the UK Cybersecurity Accountability Framework
Yes, you read that correctly. Prison time for directors who allow catastrophic cybersecurity failures. Before you close this tab in horror, hear me out. We already send directors to prison for health and safety failures. Workplace fatalities dropped 85% after the Health and Safety Executive got proper enforcement powers. The ICO? They send sternly worded letters whilst breaches affecting millions go unpunished. Today, Mauven and I lay out exactly what a proper UK cybersecurity enforcement regime would look like - one that protects small businesses whilst holding negligent executives accountable. Pull up a chair.
No MFA? No Certification. The Cyber Essentials Rule That Changes Everything
The April 2026 Cyber Essentials update introduces a game-changing rule: multi-factor authentication is now mandatory. Not recommended. Not "nice to have." Mandatory. If your cloud service offers MFA (free or paid) and you're not using it, you automatically fail. No exceptions.
This single change will expose how many UK businesses have been skating by with terrible security. With potentially 30,000+ certified companies lacking proper MFA configuration, the fallout will be significant.
You've got six months to prepare. I can tell you this is overdue and absolutely necessary. Here's what you need to do now.
Cybersecurity is Now Safeguarding - Understanding the 2025 Guidance Game-Changer
September 1st, 2025 marked a fundamental shift in UK education: cybersecurity officially became a safeguarding issue under the Keeping Children Safe in Education guidance. Paragraph 144 explicitly links cyber security to safeguarding responsibilities, meaning schools can no longer dismiss security as "just an IT problem." This changes everything from a compliance perspective. When framed as "keeping children safe" rather than "good IT security," schools respond differently. Governors now have statutory duties to ensure cyber standards are met. Yet many schools remain unaware. The Kido breach of 8,000 children's data is now officially a safeguarding failure, not just an IT incident.
⚠️ Full Disclaimer
This is my personal blog. The views, opinions, and content shared here are mine and mine alone. They do not reflect or represent the views, beliefs, or policies of:
My employer
Any current or past clients, suppliers, or partners
Any other organisation I’m affiliated with in any capacity
Nothing here should be taken as formal advice — legal, technical, financial, or otherwise. If you’re making decisions for your business, always seek professional advice tailored to your situation.
Where I mention products, services, or companies, that’s based purely on my own experience and opinions — I’m not being paid to promote anything. If that ever changes, I’ll make it clear.
In short: This is my personal space to share my personal views. No one else is responsible for what’s written here — so if you have a problem with something, take it up with me, not my employer.