Is your cloud provider a hidden national security risk in 2026?
You did not buy your cloud stack to join a geopolitical knife fight, did you?
Yet here we are.
Switzerland looked at Palantir, ran the risk checks, and said no. Not because the software is rubbish. They worried about data sovereignty and legal reach, including the risk of US access to sensitive data.
The UK did the opposite. We handed Palantir major public sector work. The NHS awarded a consortium led by Palantir the Federated Data Platform contract in November 2023, valued at £330 million over seven years.
Still think this has nothing to do with you?
You use the same vendors. You store contracts, finance, HR, customer data, and email in systems owned by companies that sit under foreign law. When politics gets ugly, governments reach for legal levers first. They do not need to kick your door in. They only need to compel a provider.
That is the uncomfortable bit about the US CLOUD Act.
It can require providers under US jurisdiction to disclose data within their possession, custody, or control, even when the data sits outside the United States.
So what does “UK hosted” even mean if you do not control the keys?
Then we get to lock in. The Ministry of Defence awarded Palantir major contracts without open competition, then expanded them. Reports describe high switching costs and a growing dependency problem.
Does your business have an exit plan?
Most do not. They have a login, a monthly bill, and blind faith.
This is not a call to delete Microsoft 365 tomorrow. This is a call to stop treating data location as the whole story. You need to know what data you hold, where it lives, who can access it, and what you would do if access rules changed overnight. You also need to know which suppliers you cannot replace quickly, and why.
What would you say if a customer asked you a simple question today: who can legally demand our data, and how would we know?
If that question makes you sweat, you need to read the full article.
| Source | Article Name |
|---|---|
| Financial Times | Palantir sues magazine that revealed Switzerland rejected its approaches |
| Republik | How tenaciously Palantir courted Switzerland |
| NHS England | NHS Federated Data Platform contract explainer |
| Contracts Finder, GOV UK | Federated Data Platform and Associated Services notice |
| Financial Times | How Palantir captured the Ministry of Defence |
| The Register | Britain's Ministry of Defence agrees deal with Palantir |
| UK Parliament, Hansard | Ministry of Defence Palantir contracts debate |
| US Department of Justice | The Purpose and Impact of the CLOUD Act, FAQs |
| Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School | 18 U.S. Code § 2713, required preservation and disclosure |